QM needs interpretation

QM is very interesting to learn and very difficult to understand . A.Peres insisted to state that QM needs no interpretation, but interpretation can not never be forbidden. Of course science is different from philosophy, and physics is based on experiments. But serious thinking of philosophy can improve science. If Einstein do not argue with Bohr, he would have not write EPR and quantum information may not birth. So interpretation have good.

But why so many interpretations of QM seem not to improve science? Because there are not Einstein and J.S.Bell! Firstly, we need thought experiment like EPR, secondly, we need realistic experiment like Bell’s state. But today nearly all interpretations other than EPR-Bohm-Bell have not thought experiments. So there exists not a Bell to construct theorem relative to realistic experiment. Though Einstein is not a experimentalist like Newton, he is a great “thought experimentalist”! We expect a interpretation with good thought experiment and theorem relative to real experiment. Bless physics!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: